![]() |
| Courtesy of Palin's very last social media outlet. |
The problem lies in the "one beloved" part.
You see the great Christopher Hitchens wrote a carefully researched, and scathing book about Mother Theresa's supposed charitable nature and what he found seriously damaged her reputation around the world.
Here is just a little of what he found:
MT was not a friend of the poor. She was a friend of poverty. She said that suffering was a gift from God. She spent her life opposing the only known cure for poverty, which is the empowerment of women and the emancipation of them from a livestock version of compulsory reproduction. And she was a friend to the worst of the rich, taking misappropriated money from the atrocious Duvalier family in Haiti (whose rule she praised in return) and from Charles Keating of the Lincoln Savings and Loan. Where did that money, and all the other donations, go? The primitive hospice in Calcutta was as run down when she died as it always had been—she preferred California clinics when she got sick herself—and her order always refused to publish any audit. But we have her own claim that she opened 500 convents in more than a hundred countries, all bearing the name of her own order. Excuse me, but this is modesty and humility?
Others who researched the claims made by Hitchens found them factual and right on target:
Canadian academics trawled through 96 per cent of all originally researched literature on the Catholic icon and concluded that her reputation as one of the holiest women of the twentieth century was the product of hype.
Researchers allege missing funds for humanitarian work and homes for the poor that did not offer the medical care they required, leaving many to die.
Serge Larivée, a researcher from the University of Montreal, said: "Given the parsimonious management of Mother Theresa's works, one may ask where the millions of dollars for the poorest of the poor have gone?”
If you think about the choosing of Mother Theresa's quote is a no-brainer for Palin as they are essentially cut from the same cloth.
Both are grifters who accept donations that they ultimately spend mostly on themselves.
Both claim to be working for the greater good, while seeking out and basking in whatever limelight will shine their way.
And both hide behind religion to keep their critics at bay.
Interestingly enough Planned Parenthood attained the highest score possible for accountability and transparency. (And if you don't believe that charity rating service, here is another.




